Beliefs & narratives / BELIEF-0012
BELIEF-0012 IDEOLOGIE_FINANCIERE IDEOLOGIE

Financial market self-regulation

Market self-regulationInvisible hand of financeDeregulation ideology

Summary

Belief that financial markets, left to themselves, self-regulate through reputation and private due diligence. Regulatory intervention is deemed unnecessary or even harmful. Ideological condition of the absence of regulation that allowed Epstein to operate without registration for 38 years. Pervasive within the American financial environment 1990-2006 (repeal of Glass-Steagall 1999).

Detailed description

Self-regulation of markets is the dominant ideology of American finance from 1980 to 2008. It postulates that market mechanisms (reputation, due diligence, competition) are sufficient to prevent fraud and abuse. The SEC system relies on voluntary declarations of regulated entities: if you do not declare yourself, you do not exist. This is not a flaw—it is the fundamental principle of the system (SOC-CONCEPT-22: consensual surveillance). The repeal of Glass-Steagall (1999) and the resistance to the regulation of derivatives (Greenspan vs Brooksley Born, 1998) are the legislative manifestations of this belief. In the Epstein case, this ideology created the structural conditions for 38 years of financial impunity.

Belief pillars

  • ◆ Les marches s'autoregulent par la reputation et la due diligence
  • ◆ La regulation etatique est inefficiente et cree des distorsions
  • ◆ Les acteurs rationnels eliminent naturellement les mauvais acteurs
  • ◆ La compliance est un cout inutile qui freine l'innovation

Origins

Period : 1980s (Revolution Reagan/Thatcher)

Deregulation financiere 1980-2000

Founders

  • • Milton Friedman
  • • Alan Greenspan
  • • Chicago School

Foundational texts

  • • Free to Choose (Friedman, 1980)

Evolution

2008

Crise des subprimes : effondrement partiel de la croyance

1980s

Revolution Reagan : deregulation bancaire, S&L crisis (premiere fissure ignoree)

1990s

Apogee : abolition Glass-Steagall (1999), resistance a la regulation des derives

2000s

Enron, WorldCom revelent des failles mais la croyance persiste

2010s

Dodd-Frank comme correctif partiel, mais ideologie toujours dominante dans le private banking UHNW

2020s

Crypto/DeFi comme renaissance de la croyance sous forme technologique

Adherents

Organizations

Diffusion vectors

Institutions

  • •Ecoles de commerce
  • •Think tanks (Cato, Heritage)
  • •Federal Reserve

Networks

  • •Wall Street
  • •K Street lobbying

Instrumentalization

Relation to power

LEGITIMANTE

Cross-references

Factcheck status

IDEOLOGIE. Ni vraie ni fausse au sens factuel — c'est un cadre interpretatif. Les crises repetees (S&L, Enron, 2008, Wirecard) demontrent empiriquement que l'autoregulation pure est insuffisante. Mais la croyance persiste car elle sert les interets des acteurs dominants du champ financier.